Sleep on: wind farms no worse than traffic, says study

Noise from wind farms is no more disruptive to sleep than traffic sounds, new research has found.

A study by sleep researchers at Flinders University has also revealed that very low-frequency wind farm noise is not audible to the human ear, either while awake or asleep.

In a project that took five years, more than 460 sleep study nights involving 68 participants were looked at.

Each person spent seven consecutive nights in the sleep laboratory.

They were recruited from four groups, including those living near a wind farm, those living near a busy suburban road and people living in quiet rural areas.

Each were played 20-second wind farm and road traffic noise samples repeatedly using three different sound pressure levels to compare their responses.

On a separate night, the study tested if longer three-minute noise samples, including very low-frequency wind farm sounds resulted in sleep disturbance.

The researchers found that short exposure to wind farm and road traffic noise triggered a small increase in people waking that could fragment their sleep patterns.

But it also showed that wind farm noise was no more disruptive than road traffic.

Chief investigator Peter Catcheside said the findings showed that both wind farm noise and road traffic noise disrupted sleep, depending mainly on how loud they were.

“However, at realistic levels, these effects were quite small,” he said.

“We also found no evidence to suggest that wind farm noise is any more disruptive to sleep than road traffic noise.

“At the highest exposure level, road traffic noise was a little more sleep disruptive than wind farm noise.”

Professor Catcheside said that while the study provided strong evidence that wind farms were not more disruptive, it did not rule out that people particularly noise sensitive might find it more difficult to get to sleep when noise levels were noticeable.

The findings were presented at an international conference on wind farm noise in Dublin last week but are still to be peer reviewed.


Tim Dornin
(Australian Associated Press)


Like This